The purported leaders of the Palestinian people have a geopolitical agenda -- the destruction of Israel -- that they will never accomplish, but rather than pursue truly ameliorative steps, they prefer to foment violence. No matter what Israel does, unless it sacrifices all sanity by engaging in inevitably fruitless negotiations with those who do not recognize Israel's legitimacy in the first place, it will face criticism not only from those who actively pursue its destruction, but also from those who passively would acquiesce to it.
So Israel once again appears to be trapped. If it withdraws unilaterally, Israel is condemned, the Palestinians see the Jews as weak, and Jews die. If Israel engages in negotiations, Israel is condemned, is perceived as weak, and Jews die. If Israel builds a wall, Israel is condemned. The unfortunate question is, if Israel builds a wall and ceases all unilateral withdrawal, a wall that can be torn down if an honest broker and legitimate partner emerges, do more Jews die? Does perceived weakness promote intensified attacks? If the answer to either or both of these questions is "no," then which policy would seem the wisest and safest for Israel to pursue, at least in the short run?
No comments:
Post a Comment