The campus that has the most extensive violations? Ohio University. The rest of the top five are Purdue, the University of Nebraska, the University of Tennessee, and the University of South Carolina. (Full disclosure: I did my PhD at Ohio and was a fellow at USC's Institute of Southern Studies for a year, though I actually only spent a couple of weeks in residence.)
I am, frankly, torn about the RIAA approach. On the one hand, it seems monumentally dumb to alienate the single largest and most important music-consuming demographic. This approach seems heavy-handed. It smacks of bullying. It also reveals just how far behind the technological curve the RIAA is.
At the same time, we live in a post-Napster age. No one can reasonably assert, especially if they are a college student, that they are not aweare of the difference between illegal and legal file-sharing and downloading. Some of the users being targeted have downloaded thousands of songs.
It would be nice if the RIAA chose lenience. Scare these kids and make sure they are aware that they only get a pass because of the largesse of the RIAA but that in exchange, from here on out their campus will have to ensure that any targeted student's usage will be strictly monitored. Intellectual property matters, and its theft -- whether through plagiarism or illegal downloading -- is not a victimless crime. At the same time, kids have been making mix tapes and trading bootlegs for ages, and those practices, far from proving detrimental to the music industry, has actually almost universally fueled consumption, album sales, and concert attendance. In a lot of ways, file sharing and downloading simply takes the place of listening to wretchedly restrictive homogenized radio formats where a virtual payola system dominates. Make sure these kids share music the right way, but keep in mind that alienating your loyalist constituency is a dumb business practice.
5 comments:
What is the point of charging these kids $3000? Does the RIAA really need the money?
I was just reading on Media 3.0 (the Shelly Palmer blog) about the rise in royalties for internet radio stations, which is going to put them out of business.
It just seems like the music industry wants to drive themselves out of business.
- Jake
Jake --
Great point re: internet radio. I have not been listening for a while because I am downloading all of my cd's onto my itunes, but usually I have a couple of internet stations that I love. And of course I use them not only to hear great music, but to hear great new music, which I then go out and buy.
I am far from an anti-capitalist, but I do loathe corporate radio, and it is corporate radio that is hugely behind the drive to price out the smaller guys on the internet (or to challenge the XM-Sirius merger). It is insane and shows just how little regard the whole industry has for all of us.
dcat
yea maybe its cause Im paranoid, but once I read this I uninstalled Limewire from my computer.
Some universities, like Northern Michigan University (NMU) are considering purchasing software to track student downloads.
http://www.thenorthwind.org/?story=5353
sities are all about maiking sure they are not liable. No one knows how to cover their ass like a university administrator.
Of course one of the problems with this whole setup is that many, many students live off campus, so you create two classes of students.
For the time being, GingerM's paranoia is probably just smart, unfortunately.
dcat
Post a Comment