Monday, February 19, 2007

Vote For [Insert Historian's Name Here]!

Over at The New Republic online the award-winning historian Steven Hahn makes the case for historians as college presidents and praises Harvard's recent selection of Drew Gilpin Faust to lead the World's Greatest University. Money argument:
Historians can be as arrogant and tone-deaf as any people who claim intellectual authority, but the nature of their work disposes them to be otherwise. Although historians pose large questions, they are skeptical of easy answers. Although they like to bring order out of apparent chaos, they quickly recognize the complexity of human undertakings. Although they seek to recover something of the past, they soon discover how much digging that requires. They come to learn that historical writing and historical experience involve conflicting perspectives and that they need to confront viewpoints different than their own. Historians have to be prepared to follow unexpected leads and uncharted paths. And they must develop skills (and patience) to hear and understand what their subjects are trying to tell them. It is all a very humbling process.

Somewhat self serving (on both Hahn's part and mine)? Sure. But not necessarily untrue for being so. The piece also serves as something of a Valentine to a premiere historian, which Faust richly deserves.

No comments: