Former Education Secretary Bill Bennett made a lot of noise recently when he made the following comment on his radio show:
“All right, well, I mean, I just don't know. I would not argue for the pro-life position based on this, because you don't know. I mean, it cuts both -- you know, one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they deal with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is that abortion is up…
I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.”
After being called on this unquestionable racist statement, Bennett simply did not understand the nature of the objection. He thought that it was because people were accusing him of advocating abortion, which is obviously was not.
THEN, he blamed the controversy on the fact that it was liberals, not he, who was racist, and their overreaction was due to the fact that the comment “hit too close to what they believe, not what I believe.”
Finally, just today, he blamed the media for misrepresenting what he had actually said.
Of course, what Bennett (and apparently those close to him) do not realize is that there was no misunderstanding his remark and it had nothing to do with abortion, but the explicit belief that blacks cause crime, in that reducing the number of black people would reduce the amount of crime committed.
This is what upsets people such as Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-MI), who wrote in his weblog:
“But what they [right-wing critics] miss is not the abortion "hypothetical" -- as absurd and tasteless as that is -- but Bennett's suggestion that African Americans are synonymous with crime. It is a text book case of stereotyping and racism, and cannot be explained away.”
But try he does. Bennett’s statement is racist in intent, and his refusal to simply apologizes or suggest he spoke before thinking is typical of conservatives of late who blame any and all problems on the media or on liberals. How sad.
Sunday, October 09, 2005
He really doesn’t get it, does he?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Marc -
I was going to write about Bennett, but I did not even know where to start. let's keep in mind that this gasbag set himself up as the final arbiter of virtue in this world, choosing what to emphasize (sex! drugs!) and what to omit (gambling; racism) based solely on his own personal peccadilloes. I tend to go lightly on Williams alums because we share a common bond, but you know what? Bill Bennett is a fucking asshole. (It's nice not to have editors and taste monitors here at dcat ready to pounce on my every word.) Under normal circumstances the approriate thing would be to develop an argument and not an ad hominem, but sometimes the ad hominem is the argument. What is at issue here is that Bill Bennett is a jerk, a racist, a hypocrite and, as you point out, someone seemingly congenitally incapable of accepting responsibility. he makes coments, the media reports it, and it is the media's fault? It is somehow liberals' fault? Egads.
dcat
Post a Comment